If an investigation reveals sufficient evidence of misconduct, what is the term used for such a finding?

The term used for a finding that indicates sufficient evidence of misconduct is "sustained." When an investigation concludes that the evidence supports the claims of misconduct, the result is considered sustained, which confirms that the allegations are valid based on the information gathered. This finding often leads to further actions, such as disciplinary measures or policy reviews within the organization.

In contrast, exonerated refers to a finding where the individual is declared not guilty of the alleged misconduct. Inconclusive indicates that the investigation did not reach a definitive conclusion, meaning there was not enough evidence to prove or disprove the allegations. Unfounded means that the investigation determined that the claims had no basis in fact.

Understanding these terms is crucial for interpreting the outcomes of investigations correctly and knowing the implications of each finding.